Skip to main content

Google Earth's Deepfake AI: Pulled in a Day

The rapid introduction of an artificial intelligence feature allowing users to easily modify satellite imagery via text prompts has swiftly proven pro

1 min read9 views5 tags
Originally reported bytheverge

The rapid introduction of an artificial intelligence feature allowing users to easily modify satellite imagery via text prompts has swiftly proven problematic. Google has consequently disabled a Google Earth tool, launched just last Thursday, which granted users the capability to generate AI "deepfakes" of real-world locations. This functionality was notably exploited by Digital Digging’s Henk van Ess, who intentionally produced disturbing images, including depictions of refugees near the Mexican border and a bomb crater adjacent to a hospital in Gaza. Google's initial response to van Ess's findings stated that images generated using the Nano Banana 2 feature within Google Earth were digitally watermarked and that the company aimed to prevent "image creation on harmful topics."

Just one day later, Google issued a revised statement acknowledging the unique trust placed in Google Earth as a reliable source of global imagery. While the company noted that geospatial professionals had found various useful applications for the feature, it also observed users sharing screenshots of generated imagery that appeared to violate its established policies. Consequently, Google announced the temporary rollback of this Google Earth feature to implement more robust "guardrails." The company clarified that generated images were not visible to others within the main Google Earth experience and were clearly watermarked as AI-generated, though these measures ultimately proved insufficient.

Further underscoring the feature's vulnerabilities, van Ess demonstrated that he was able to bypass Hive’s AI detection tool with a video created using Google Earth. This highlights the potential for such generated media to circulate widely despite the presence of watermarks. Van Ess explicitly stated regarding his testing, "Nothing was refused, nothing was softened, and nothing suggested I try a different prompt," indicating a concerning lack of content moderation or filtering within the AI generation process.

#AI News#Google Earth#Deepfake AI#Harmful Content#AI Guardrails
ES
Editorial StaffEditor

The Editorial Staff at AIChief is a team of professional content writers with extensive experience in AI and marketing. Founded in 2025, AIChief has quickly grown into the largest free AI resource hub in the industry.

View all posts
Reader feedback

What did you think of this story?

User Comments

Filter:
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Continue reading
View all news