The Editorial Staff at AIChief is a team of professional content writers with extensive experience in AI and marketing. Founded in 2025, AIChief has quickly grown into the largest free AI resource hub in the industry.
Epoch AI Criticized for Delayed Disclosure of OpenAI Funding
Epoch AI faces scrutiny for not disclosing OpenAI funding for FrontierMath, raising questions about transparency and benchmark objectivity.

Originally reported bytechcrunch
Epoch AI, a nonprofit focused on creating mathematical benchmarks for AI, has come under criticism for not disclosing funding from OpenAI until December 20.
This revelation, made through a public post, detailed that OpenAI supported the development of FrontierMath, a benchmark designed to assess an AI’s mathematical problem-solving capabilities.
OpenAI used FrontierMath in demonstrating its upcoming flagship AI, o3. Contributors to the project were reportedly unaware of this partnership, which has sparked allegations of non-transparency.
A contractor for Epoch AI, posting under the username “Meemi” on the LessWrong forum, expressed concerns that the lack of transparency left contributors uninformed about their work’s association with OpenAI.
Critics fear this could undermine the credibility of FrontierMath as an unbiased benchmark. Furthermore, Stanford mathematics PhD student Carina Hong alleged that OpenAI gained exclusive access to the benchmark, a point that unsettled several contributing mathematicians.
Epoch AI’s associate director, Tamay Besiroglu, acknowledged mistakes in communication, explaining that contractual restrictions delayed the disclosure.
He admitted that Epoch AI should have ensured transparency with contributors from the outset, emphasizing that mathematicians deserved clarity about how their work would be used.
Besiroglu reassured the community that OpenAI has verbally agreed not to train its AI on FrontierMath’s problems and that a separate holdout set ensures independent verification of results.
Despite these assurances, Epoch AI lead mathematician Ellot Glazer stated that the organization has yet to independently verify OpenAI’s reported results for o3. While Glazer expressed confidence in OpenAI’s adherence to agreed terms, he noted that final verification is still pending.
This controversy highlights the ongoing challenges in developing AI benchmarks while ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest. It underscores the need for clearer communication and safeguards to maintain trust in the AI research community.
#news
ES
Editorial Staff Editor
View all posts
Filter:
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Related stories
More than 1 in 10 chance AI ‘could kill all humans,’ says Anthropic safety lead after colleague quits
#ainews
The departing researcher said AI companies are ‘gambling with our lives’ by racing to develop self-improving AI. The departing researcher said AI companies are ‘gambling with our lives’ by racing to d...
4h ago
Your last chance to host a Side Event at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 ends tonight
#ainews
We’re giving you one last chance. After tonight, applications close. If you’ve been waiting to bring your founders, investors, customers, partners, or community together during Disrupt week,this is th...
16h ago
The DoD reportedly asked OpenAI to provide military AI that rarely declined to cooperate.
#ainews
The Intercept, citing documents it had seen, reported that the Pentagon requested a custom version of OpenAI’s technology with “minimal refusal rates” for military commands. OpenAI denied ever having...
16h ago