OpenAI has confirmed that it has spoken with government officials regarding its ongoing investigation into DeepSeek. The company previously stated that it has evidence showing DeepSeek trained its AI models using data improperly obtained from OpenAI’s API.
During an interview with Bloomberg TV, OpenAI’s chief global affairs officer, Chris Lehane, shared that these discussions have taken place, emphasizing the seriousness of the situation.
The accusations against DeepSeek have sparked debates, as some critics argue that OpenAI itself has been accused of similar actions. Several publishers, including The New York Times, have taken legal action against OpenAI, claiming its AI models were trained on copyrighted materials without permission.
Lehane defended OpenAI’s stance, drawing a distinction between its practices and those of DeepSeek. He compared OpenAI’s method of AI training to reading a library book and learning from it, while describing DeepSeek’s approach as taking that book, replacing the cover, and selling it as an original creation.
This analogy closely resembles the argument put forward by The New York Times in its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI. The legal battle surrounding AI model training raises broader concerns about data usage, ownership, and ethical AI development.
The situation highlights growing tensions in the AI industry, where companies are navigating complex legal and ethical challenges while competing for technological advancement.
OpenAI’s move to engage with government officials suggests that it is taking proactive steps to address the issue, though questions remain about its own practices. As investigations continue, the debate over AI training methods and intellectual property rights is expected to intensify, shaping future regulations and policies for the industry.
